Click on the picture to enlarge.
Frusty the Confused Voter
Frusty's Law, Moral of the Story: It is the classic dilemma faced by the confused voters. If he doesn't vote then he doesn't fulfill his duty as good citizen. And if he votes he has to select of the candidates with dubious credentials. Probably that is why the movement of negative voting is gaining popularity. But that would mean changing the law which of coarse is a slow and tedious process. Also the politicians would not favor such a provision as it would go against their interest. Till then I think the best recourse for the voter is to cast his vote and select the BAD amongst the WORST choices he has.
This story is in continuation on Nav's article.
Frusty's Law, Moral of the Story: It is the classic dilemma faced by the confused voters. If he doesn't vote then he doesn't fulfill his duty as good citizen. And if he votes he has to select of the candidates with dubious credentials. Probably that is why the movement of negative voting is gaining popularity. But that would mean changing the law which of coarse is a slow and tedious process. Also the politicians would not favor such a provision as it would go against their interest. Till then I think the best recourse for the voter is to cast his vote and select the BAD amongst the WORST choices he has.
This story is in continuation on Nav's article.
No comments:
Post a Comment